messagefollowdashboard

edelgarfield:

“a lot of media, including media intended for teenage and general audiences is highly sexualized and it can be extremely difficult for sex-averse people to consume content” and “sex scenes are an important form of creative expression especially for queer audiences” are concepts that can coexist.

like blaming sex-averse people for their own discomfort is so gross and just reeks of amatonormativity. and giving us the whole “people don’t have to cater to you” speech is just. Yes. We Fucking Know. The entire world is built on the assumption that we don’t exist. Nobody is required to remove or sanitize their content on our behalf, but we’re allowed to express frustration that we can’t watch the same shows our friends are watching without having to manage our discomfort.

“a lot of media, including media intended for teenage and general audiences is highly sexualized and it can be extremely difficult for sex-averse people to consume content” and “sex scenes are an important form of creative expression especially for queer audiences” are concepts that can coexist.

saewokhrisz:

image
image

i cannot deal with this man hes literally the sweetest…

snakeoid:

image
image

they should

cykelops:

me: wish games had choices that actually mattered

me when games have choices that actually matter:

image

wecanthavethat:

asteroidtroglodyte:

hometoursandotherstuff:

image

It’s a Tree. There was a tree there. Folks cut down a tree, they usually don’t pull the roots, it’s like a Whalefall for fungus and burrowing invertebrates. They feast for decades.

It’s tree roots. I know that’s not cool and adventurous but I promise you it’s tree roots.

No, that’s where they dumped the body of my good friend, Mr. Five by Five. We called him that because he was five feet tall and five feet wide. Perfectly spherical.

thisvegetabledoesntfallinlove:

thisvegetabledoesntfallinlove:

there is, in fact, a “platonic explanation for this” if you’re not a coward

its so fun to see the diversity of tags on this ranging from “they’re literally just standing next to each other” to “deep bonds dont have to be romantic/sexual!” to “yeah friends can fuck nasty, platonically. coward.” we’re all so correct, there are, in fact, a million platonic explanations for this

fluentisonus:

genuinely inconsolable I can’t have one of these pompeii bread plushies fr.

A tweet from 黒織部 @kurooribe reading: "ポンペイ展グッズの目玉(?)が「炭化したパン」シリーズ。画像2枚目がその実物。再現度高い。炭化したパンのクッションって何なんだよ。 #東博 #ポンペイ展" followed by a picture of a museum gift shop displaying carbonized bread plushies. This has been quote retweeted by Tori Lee @toriflee with the added comment: "Oh my godddd, #ClassicsTwitter, this Pompeii exhibition at the Tokyo National Museum has CARBONIZED BREAD PLUSHIES [heart eyes emoji] There are also column plushies. And they are not available online [sad face emoji]"ALT
A tweet from Clodia @Clodia55680147, reading: "Japan had a Pompeii exhibit and made very special souvenir I would pay someone for. Carbonized bread plushie!" followed by a picture of a carbonized bread plushie.ALT
A display from a museum gift shop of plushies shaped like carbonized loaves of bread from Pompeii, i.e. round and segmented, with a stamps on them and cracks in them.ALT
A plushie shaped like a carbonized loaf of bread from Pompeii, i.e. round and segmented, with a stamp on it and cracks in it.ALT